A couple of years ago I had a rather detailed homework assignment for one of the courses I was taking. At first, I thought that the homework was really unnecessary - it was just "busy work".
The assignment was to quickly write down the steps I use to evaluate online materials - in other words, whether or not the website can be trusted. Then to go online and find five resources that I would use, and why I would use them.
Really? I teach this stuff - do I really have to do this?
Yes.
What I discovered was what that it's not as simple as I thought. Sure, there are the common sense checks, such as:
- Who's the author?
- Credentials?
- Can the information be verified?
- How current is the information?
- Are opinions clearly identified?
- Who sponsors the website?
Can those questions above be applied to these types of websites? I think that they can, but there are other questions one needs to ask as well.
Social Media questions:
- Can the identity of the source of shared information be verified?
- Can the information on the profile page be verified?
- Can institutions and/or companies be identified?
- Is the blog posting signed by an identifiable author?
- A guest author?
- Who are they?
- Is the blog posting cited on other blogs? (Use Technorati - a blog search engine - to find out.)
- Do new postings appear fairly regularly?
- Can one identify all of those who are able to edit or add content?
- Who are they?
- Are there guidelines for contributors to follow?
- Is the wiki moderated? That is, is there an editor? Who are they?
So, does this teach me anything about homework - yes, I still hate it, but once again I did learn something new and that is always wicked awesome.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please, keep it relevant and clean. Thanks!